BOWLING GREEN INDEPENDENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Year 2009 - 2010


vicki writsel
Reponsible Person

vicki writsel
Contact Person

 

 

 Approved :
2/16/2009
Date

Members or Committee:

Deborah

Williams

Diane

Howerton

Hamp

Moore

Jacqueline

Pope-Tarrence

Michael

Bishop

Lee

Jordan

Jeff

Herron

Jennifer

Davis

Joe

Tinius

Jon

Lawson

Ken

May

Kim

Simpson

Leslie

Peek

Mike

McCloud

Rickey

Shive

Dennis

Chaney

Doug

Hawkins

Tonya

Matthews

Susan

George

Debi

Jordan

Alan

Read

Morrie

Popelier

Heidi

Brandon

Patty

Alford

Kelly

Wiseman

Monyanna

Shive

Abraham

Williams

Michele

Boling

Jessie

Parks

James

Robinson

Frances

Johnson

Brown

Fred

Gouvas

Ernie

Freeman

Lisa

Jack

Neal

Renee

White

Mi'Shan

Dunn

Karrie

Aikins

Karen

Manley

Executive Summary

BOWLING GREEN INDEPENDENT

Mission Statement: Our mission statement is: "Building on a tradition of excellence, Bowling Green City Schools lead the way in education for all". This mission statement was last revised in September, 2006, during a two day strategic planning initiative. Teachers, principals, Board members, parents, central office staff and students continually revisit the mission statement as a guide for planning and decision making. To achieve this mission, Bowling Green City Schools staff continually focuses on Building Relationships, Engaging Students, Teaching 21st Century Skills, and Personal and Professional Growth.
Needs Assessment: A committee consisting of school and district administrators, school council members and teachers reviewed CATS Assessment data disaggregated by sub groups, attendance data, employee satisfaction surveys, discipline data, the Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process for special education, the preschool performance report, and AMAO data for English Language Learners. This group also reviewed the Standards and Indicators for School Improvement and identified district needs for improving teaching and learning to reduce achievement gaps. Additionally, because the administrative team conducted a self-study using the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Standards. Goals:
The district leadership team studied current practice using the Standards and Indicators for School Improvement. Strategies were developed to improve teaching and learning based on the rubric associated with the SISI document. The leadership team developed achievement goals in Reading and Math to meet No Child Left Behind Accountability Targets and to reduce achievement gaps per KRS 158.649. Because the district did not make the Annual Measurable Achievement Objective for the rate at which ESL students were becoming fluent in English, strategies were written to address improved services and supports for ESL students. Strategies were also written to address improvements in transition planning for students with disabilities. Because the district did not make Adequate Yearly Progress for students with disabilities in Reading, goals and activities were written to accelerate the achievement of students with disabilities in Reading. Goals were also written to address leadership development opportunities for the administrative team.
Evaluation:
The effectiveness of the plan with respect to improved student performance in Reading and Math will be evaluated through benchmark assessments three times per year. The effectiveness of school and district leadership will be assessed through teacher surveys and district wide culture audits.
Stakeholders:
In October, building and school administrators met with SBDM councils from all schools to identify achievement gaps and design strategies to reduce those gaps. All administrators have been involved in determining benchmark assessment targets. Additionally, parents, teachers, and administrators met for two days to study the district's special education program and develop strategies to improve student achievement. ACCESS data and ESL delivery models were studied to develop strategies to improve the rate at which students are learning English.

Component: Leadership
Component Manager:
Joe Tinius
Date: 1/14/2009
Name:
BOWLING GREEN INDEPENDENT

Priority Need: Walkthrough observations, studies of student data, and interviews with teachers show that teachers need guidance regarding effective research based instructional practices for students in poverty, students with disabilities, ESL students, students who represent minority ethnic groups and gifted and talented students. According to the Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Report for Special Education, suspension rates for students with disabilities are among the highest in the region. According to the AMAO report for English language learners, ESL students are not achieving fluency in reading and writing the English language at an acceptable rate.

 

Goal: Walkthrough observations will show positive behavior supports, effective research based instructional strategies, and proficient student work displayed in 90% of all classrooms.

 

Benchmark

Measure

Date

Projected Data

Actual Data

walkthrough observations

4/30/2008

60

 

walkthrough observations

9/30/2009

75

 

walkthrough observations

12/15/2009

90

 

 

GS No.

NCLBSB168

Strategy/Activity

Responsible Person

Start Date

End Date

Cost/Funding Source

INI

Impact

1

Both

Principals and School Leadership Teams will receive professional development strategies for coaching teachers in effective practices for classroom instruction, assessment design and grading practices.

Davis

2/10/2009

11/10/2009

 

 

$2000

Title II,

 

 

2

Both

Professional development will be provided for all instructional staff regarding positive behavior supports and interventions for at risk students as well as how to use disciplinary data to identify students who need individualized instruction and support to build prosocial skills.

Writsel

4/15/2008

12/15/2008

 

 

$3000

IDEA

 

 

3

Both

The district Walkthrough Observation Tool will be revised to provide more explicit feedback to teachers to facilitate 21st Century Teaching and Learning including building relationships, engaging students to help students develop global awareness, critical thinking skills, communication skills, collaboration skills and technology skills.

Davis

2/12/2008

12/9/2008

 

 

0

No Funding

 

 

4

Both

Highly qualified employees who are committed to the district's mission of an excellent and equitable learning opportunity for all students will be recruited and hired through a rigorous screening process.

May

1/28/2008

12/19/2008

 

 

 

 

5

Both

District leadership will work with principals and teams of teachers from each school to develop Professional Learning Communities in each school, based on the research of Richard and Rebecca DuFour, to build capacity for continuous improvement and higher levels of learning for all students and to insure that systems are in place to monitor student learning, to respond immediately when students have difficulty, and to extend learning for students who are proficient.

Writsel

1/20/2009

3/25/2009

 

 

3600

Title I

1200

Title II

 

 

6

Both

District leadership will facilitate monthly meetings with teams of content teachers from each school to ensure that each school's curriculum is properly sequenced between grade levels and between schools, to eliminate gaps and overlaps, to develop a balanced assessment in each classroom to promote 21st century learning.

Davis

2/10/2009

12/15/2009

 

 

3000

Title II

 

 

Component: Math
Component Manager:
Jennifer Davis
Date: 1/14/2009
Name:
BOWLING GREEN INDEPENDENT

Priority Need: According to the No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report, 68.27% of all students scored at the Proficient Level in Math in Spring of 2008 on the Kentucky Core Content Test. However, this report showed disparities in student achievement in Math among subgroups of students. 46.87% of African American students scored at the proficient level in Math. 49.38% of Hispanic students scored at the proficient level in Math. 44.44% of students with limited English proficient scored at the proficient level in Math. 50.73% of students in poverty scored at the proficient level in Math. 32.86% of students with disabilities scored at the proficient level in Math.

 

Goal: By December 2009, Think Link Benchmark assessment will show that 64.58% of African American students, 66.25% of Hispanic students, 67.15% of students in poverty, 62.96% of ESL students and 55.25% of students with disabilities are scoring at the proficient level in Math. To achieve these goals, 78.85% of all students will score at the Proficient Level in Math on the Think Link Benchmark administered in December, 2009. When the district meets these goals for student subgroups, 78.85% of all students will score at the Proficient Level in Math.

 

Benchmark

Measure

Date

Projected Data

Actual Data

Think Link Benchmark

3/28/2009

73

 

KCCT

5/21/2009

78

 

Think Link Benchmark

12/21/2009

78

 

 

GS No.

NCLBSB168

Strategy/Activity

Responsible Person

Start Date

End Date

Cost/Funding Source

INI

Impact

1

Both

All students in grades K-2 will be assessed with Mclass Math assessment three times yearly. Students performing below benchmark, will receive targeted and systematic intervention using scientifically research based instructional strategies at least 30 minutes daily.

Davis

1/12/2009

12/18/2009

 

 

5000

Title I

3000

Title III

5000

IDEA

 

 

2

Both

All students in grades 3-10 will be assessed with the Think Link Math Predictive Assessment System, three times during the school year. Students performing below the Proficient level in Math will receive at least 30 minutes of Math intervention daily using scientifically research based instructional strategies.

Davis

1/12/2009

12/18/2009

 

 

5000

Title I

3000

Title III

3000

IDEA

 

 

3

Both

District leadership will facilitate discussion and study of student work with Math teachers from each school to insure that the taught curriculum is of high quality across all schools and that teacher designed assessments are standards based requiring students to use higher order thinking skills at a proficient level.

Davis

2/10/2009

11/9/2009

 

 

3000

Title II

 

 

Component: Reading
Component Manager: V
icki Writsel
Date: 1/14/2009
Name:
BOWLING GREEN INDEPENDENT

Priority Need: 73.76% of all students within the Bowling Green School System scored at the Proficient level in Reading on the Spring, 2008 Kentucky Core Content Test as reported on the No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report. Among these students there were discrepancies between subgroups. 52.71% of African American students scored at the Proficient Level. 55.76% of Hispanic students scored at the Proficient Level. 47.74% of students with limited English proficiency scored at the Proficient Level. 57.02% of students in poverty scored at Proficient Level and 35% of Special Education students scored at Proficient Level.

 

Goal: By December 2009, Think Link benchmark probes will show that 82.51% of all students are scoring at the Proficient Level in Reading. 68.47% of African American students will score at the Proficient Level. 70.51% of all Hispanics students will score at the Proficient Level. 65.09% of all students with limited English proficiency will score at the Proficient Level. 71.35% of students in poverty will score at the Proficient Level. 56.67% of students with disabilities will score at the Proficient Level.

 

Benchmark

Measure

Date

Projected Data

Actual Data

Think Link PAS

2/2/2009

77.76

 

KCCT

5/15/2009

82.51

 

Think Link PAS

9/30/2009

82.51

 

 

GS No.

NCLBSB168

Strategy/Activity

Responsible Person

Start Date

End Date

Cost/Funding Source

INI

Impact

1

Both

Each student in grades K-3 will be assessed three times during the school year with the Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE) and Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy (DIBELS). Students performing below benchmark will receive 30 to 60 minutes of reading intervention daily using scientifically research based instructional strategies.

Writsel

1/5/2009

12/30/2009

 

 

$50,000

ESS

$10,000

Title I

$15,000

ESS

$30,000

Title III

$15,000

IDEA

 

 

2

Both

Students in grades 3 through 10 will be assessed three times yearly with think Link benchmark assessment. Students performing below benchmark will receive systematic and explicit intervention 30 to 60 minutes daily.

Writsel

2/2/2009

12/18/2009

 

 

$15,000

ESS

$30,000

Title I

$30,000

IDEA

 

 

3

Both

Literacy Coaches will provide job embedded professional development for classroom teachers to support more rigorous core instruction.

Writsel

1/12/2009

12/18/2009

 

 

10,000

Adolescent Literacy

$20,000

Title I

$25,000

Reading First

$50,000

Read to Achieve

 

 

4

Both

General education teachers, special education teachers and ESL teachers will receive professional development regarding research based instructional strategies for building Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency skills among ESL students and student with disabilities.

Writsel

1/12/2009

12/14/2009

 

 

$5000

Reading First

$5000

Title I

$5000

IDEA

$5000

Title III

 

 

5

Both

Early literacy skills including vocabulary and phonemic awareness will be taught in the preschool program and student progress will be monitored quarterly with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and PALs.

Writsel

1/19/2009

12/21/2009

 

 

$5000

preschool

$5000

Even Start

 

 

6

Both

A curriculum pacing guide will be developed to insure that support teachers such as special education and ESL teachers teach the Kentucky Program of Studies to students during the time these students receive Reading Intervention.

Writsel

1/26/2009

12/21/2009

 

 

0

No Funding